On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 22:18 +0100, Christophe Henry wrote:
It appears that you should read the 2005 post a lot more carefully, especially the quoted context. The remarks you quote above have *nothing* to do with the impossibility I claimed.
No, I won't spend "a lot more" time trying to decipher the supposedly hidden meaning of your post and invest the time more wisely by making MSM more useful.
Well that last comment is at least a positive practical outcome. I've been keeping right out of this precisely because it is a waste of everyone's time. I'm personally prepared to let quite a lot go due to ambiguities of the medium, never mind language barriers, maybe you should seriously consider doing the same. In case that isn't clear enough: I find your dogmatic attitude that your interpretation of Andreas's post lacking in grace and courtesy, never mind whether your interpretation is "correct".
The link I added seems quite clear to me and anyone interested can make himself his own opinion by opening it.
I did. I felt no need to respond as my personal interpretation was quite different to yours, and I couldn't see anything productive coming from responding to a post that seemed to be unnecessarily confrontational. Seasons greetings....