12 Mar
2011
12 Mar
'11
7:08 a.m.
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 05:00:49 +0100 "Domagoj Saric" <dsaritz@gmail.com> wrote: Thank you for the review, and comments. Most of them require no response, but I will address one point:
My primary concern is lack of support for true, efficient, no-fail-guarantee fixed-size integers: [...] This might at first be viewed as a possibly 'conditional yes' vote but since Chad has repeatedly said that he considers fixed-sized integers to be 'second class citizens' of his library I vote no for such a library...
The whole point of the library is unlimited-size integers. I plan to improve the fixed-size integers, but they are not the primary focus of the library. -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * *