29 Oct
2007
29 Oct
'07
4:49 p.m.
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
It seems a rational idea; "NVI" is always better.
nvi?
Non-Virtual Interface. Say, Non-Specializable-Metafunction in this context? :-)
BTW, why not remove range_size<> from RandomAccessConcept, which is utterly useless, and even wrong around iterator range.
I'm all for removing it.
Why do you think it's wrong?
`boost::size(make_iterator_range(...))` would copy range_difference<...>::type into std::size_t. boost::make_unsigned<> might help, but anyway it is unneeded to force range_size<> specialization. Regards, -- Shunsuke Sogame