17 Mar
2016
17 Mar
'16
11:06 p.m.
On 03/17/2016 06:58 PM, Glen Fernandes wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Phil Bouchard
wrote: Is that acceptable?
Looks much better.
I'm assuming allocate_node<U>(Allocator<U>(n1, m1), 1, 'a'); would also work, in which case the interface is as tidy as allocate_shared.
No I'm sorry but:
allocate_node<U>(Allocator<U>(n1, m1), 1, 'a');
Can't work. It needs to be in the form:
allocate_node<U>(make_node_allocator