26 Aug
2005
26 Aug
'05
1:18 p.m.
"Slawomir Lisznianski" <slisznianski@asyncnet.com> writes:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 02:12:12 +0200, "Ariel Badichi"
A good solution is to provide a customization point: call a handler that can be replaced by the user.
The language already provides this customization through set_unexpected and set_terminate.
Althought no standard mandates it, it is commonly expected that each thread can set its own terminate() or unexpected() function -- calling set_terminate() or set_unexpected() in one thread affects only the exceptions in that thread.
What's expected doesn't matter. It's what's implemented that counts. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com