12 Oct
2023
12 Oct
'23
4:02 a.m.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 11:48 AM Richard Hodges via Boost
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 04:51, Klemens Morgenstern via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Given the renaming requirement, I'd like to query the list if there are any objections to any of the following names:
Are we confirming acceptance of the names by not answering, or answering in the positive?
Either is fine, I just need to make sure the names are acceptable at this point. I am also open to serious ideas.
async.core await co_async / cosync co20 / cor20
FWIW, of these, cosync seems to me to be the most intuitive.
That's good. I fear other people might interpret it as co_... sync, i.e. something that co_awaits synchronous things. Maybe spelled co_sync is worse?