Re: [boost] Should Boost adopt pimpl/d-pointer as much as it can?

On 21 March 2010 18:37, Emil Dotchevski <emildotchevski@gmail.com> wrote:

This line of thought misses the point of physically decoupling implementation details from interfaces. It *is* easier not to do it, this doesn't prove that it's better not to do it.

But worse is better. "Just copy the headers" makes replication of the "virus" much easier.