25 Mar
2015
25 Mar
'15
12:52 p.m.
On 22/03/2015 07:52, Louis Dionne wrote:
Peter Dimov
writes: Louis Dionne wrote:
Eric Niebler
writes: ... FWIW, these indices don't seem all that useful to me. What exactly was the desired behavior?
No idea
The desired behavior was for indexing the sorted tuple to work like indexing the original tuple. That is, given tuple
, you were supposed to produce another tuple for which get<0> still returns char[4], even though the first element is physically char[1]. Oh, yes of course. Then I think the original code did not do the right thing, or I made a mistake while translating it to Hana.
What's wrong with the original code?