On 17.03.2017 11:16, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
On 17.03.2017 10:40, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
I'm ok about recommending PRs but not issues. Bugs should be reported to > the system chosen by the library maintainers. For some, it is still > Trac.
Some Boost libraries disable Github issues, presumably for this reason. But the main page needs to be simple and clear. It should direct people to http://github.com/boostorg/<library>. Listing individual preferences on the main page doesn't scale.
I suggest each library gets its own home page (on http://boostorg.github.io/<library>, ...
The libraries already get their own pages at http://github.com/boostorg/<library> - they just need to use their README files as intended.
Sure, library maintainers can use http://github.com/boostorg/<library>, but these are not yet used as the canonical source of information. The main library listings on www.boost.org don't point to those. Switching from the centralized listing in http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/ to the above (and similarly getting rid of http://www.boost.org/development/bugs.html) would be one other substantial step towards modularization. Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...