Hmm, that fails a number of tests with error rates > 10^10 - see for
example test_exp.cpp. Can you investigate?
Never mind - I think I have it - needed to replace uses of cpp_dec_float_max_digits10 with cpp_dec_float_total_digits10 which does what it says, where as cpp_dec_float_max_digits10 doesn't anymore. With that change the tests I've run pass so far.... but they're still running.
Maybe we should rename cpp_dec_float_max_digits10 to something else? Or eliminate it because it is redundant. I will report soon.
BTW, what's the logic behind the +1 in defining that one? Not that it makes much difference either which way. It's redundant and not needed, as addition of +1 should be done in std::numeric_limits anyway.
Cheers, John.
Thanks again, John. I got the tests running. What a nice test suite! I need to run the tests myself and know if the tests are OK before suggesting any changes. Is there a collected summary of the output files? Is this target report at the end of the test run of concern? ...failed updating 7 targets... ...skipped 21 targets... ...updated 574 targets... Best regards, Chris.