[boost] Re: lightweight replacement for boost::function

"John Torjo" <john.lists@torjo.com> wrote in message news:4123762F.5060101@torjo.com... | Dear boosters, | | Did a lightweight replacement for boost::function (compile-wise). Focus | was on making it very fast to compile. Have you tested normal code on a compiler with precompiled headers? I can include seriously large headers faster than compiling simple code again. I have long been wanting to use <boost/std.hpp> <boost/boost.hpp>. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a portable way to create/use PCH. Or did bjam already support this? br Thorsten