On Aug 5, 2008, at 2:22 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote: [SNIP]
Right now shifted_ptr_test2.cpp works perfectly fine with the slightly adapted STL container to smart pointers and using special allocators needed to define all internal characteristics used by the container. We see in shifted_allocator:
template <typename T> class shifted_allocator { public: typedef shifted<T> value_type; typedef shifted_ptr<T> pointer; typedef const shifted_ptr<T> const_pointer; ... };
- value_type: being the real concrete type expected by the smart pointer - pointer: defines the node pointer used internaly by the container [TRUNCATE]
Isn't "const_pointer" supposed to be an analogue of "T const *"? Right now, you have it represent "T * const", which definitely isn't the same thing! -- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com