On 7/18/2011 4:17 AM, Klaim - Joël Lamotte wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:33, Thomas Heller<thom.heller@googlemail.com>wrote:
... How about getting the software and host a boost like github/svnhub/mercurialhub whatever (provided we have the necessary ressources)?
Something like Rhodecode? (http://rhodecode.org/) This one isn't ready to be used with any other kind of repo than mercurial/hg, even if it's promising (I'm using it for private repos).
So I think you would have to choose between: 1. use mercurial only (I guess it's not a real option) 2. contribute to rhodecode or another similar software to complete it for boost community needs 3. write your own repo manager
It looks like none of those options would likely be done in short term. Maybe public hosting services could be a short-term solution while efforts are being done for a boost-community-managed service. That said, it's not a suggestion, just an observation.
I think this is moving in the opposite direction. We want to have less management work, not more. So it seems like a big drawback, just so we can have a single libraries index/catalog. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail