Emil Dotchevski wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj@gmail.com> wrote:
There is actually a worse problem. Any solution involving a namespace alias will break code like:
namespace boost { namespace fusion { namespace extension { template<> struct begin_impl<...> { ... }; } } }
It would also break forward declarations found in user code, which are perhaps not officially supported but I've done my share of:
namespace boost { template <class> class function; }
Ok, aliasing the boost namespace is out. That only leaves the preprocessor unless I'm missing something. Which, unless Boost radically changes the way headers are included or someone finds a conforming workaround, is not possible... Doh. -- Sohail Somani http://uint32t.blogspot.com