On 01/08/2010 08:05 PM, Christian Holmquist wrote:
One thing that I miss from the documentation are performance numbers and guides, I think this is a sensitive issue that should be given its own section. By reading the code samples I get some performance concerns only because the code looks 'potentially expensive' (named_scopes, for instance), having the documentation telling me I should not worry together with some tests I could compile and run would elimante such concerns, and spare users like myself some time in doing their own (possibly faulty) performance analysis. Besides this, the documentation I find the documentation good and easy to follow.
Yes, I intend to add this section to the docs later. There has been some performance testing with comparison to log4cxx. You may find interesting the discussion in this forum thread: http://tinyurl.com/ya85vwf
Edit: I just found the performance folder in libs/test/, maybe it'll tell me something.
This is a half-baked test that I used to measure performance of different sink frontends.