Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
Also your compilation of algorithms is very big. I've being doing something similar on an as need basis but on a much smaller scale. Do you plan to boostify the library and submit it for review? I would kill to use it :).
Though I doubt it will be submitted, there is a plan to boostify and upload it to Vault. After all, if Boost.Range officially offers the (good portable) range adaptors, my work can be a painful experience. :-)
The only think i do not like much is the choice of names. I would have preferred 'reverse' instead of 'reversed' or 'transform' instead of 'transformed', but it is just a matter of personal preference.
It depends on whether or not the range-based STL algorithms should be placed in the same namespace as the adaptors. For now, oven follows the range library proposal. Regards, -- Shunsuke Sogame