On Sep 9, 2010, at 1:56 AM, Michal Sojka wrote:
On Sep 9, 2010, at 4:28 AM, Andreas Huber wrote:
I had also thought about using clang but I was not able to compile even simple FSMs with it. I produced a lot of strange errors. I guess that clang's C++ support is not as mature as of GCC. Do you have more positive experience with clang++?
When did you test clang? Quite recently, Doug Gregor announced that clang now compiles all of Boost. Also, the current test results look quite promising to me:
<http://www.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/statechart.html>
When Doug talks about clang compiling all of boost, he doesn't mean the latest released version (2.7, I think). He means taking the "top of tree" from the clang/llvm subversion repo. -- Marshall P.S. A new release of llvm (2.8) is scheduled for the end of September.