The macro BOOST_NO_IS_ABSTRACT should be defined. Also, be sure you are using the option -library=stlport4 on every CC command line. The configuration files for Sun should set up that option already. --- Steve Clamage, stephen.clamage@sun.com Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
Jeff Garland wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 21:29:09 -0500, Douglas Gregor wrote
Just a follow-up: I've installed the Sun compilers on one of our OSL systems. It shows up as "OSL4" (sunpro-5_8u1-sunos) on the regression tests. It's far too late in the Boost release cycle to consider it a release platform, but we'll be running the tests nightly regardless.
This is interesting. Looks like Sun has made some serious forward progress. By my eye it looks like about 1/2 of the date-time tests now pass. And that's a bit deceiving as it looks like a handful of problems are preventing most of the rest from compiling. As usual, it's I/O that's at the root of a big chunk of the problems. As I recall when Caleb was running SunPro almost none of date-time would compile...
Only one Iiostreams tests passes. All the errors I've checked are either internal errors or problems with is_abstract. is_abstract_test, from type traits, is also failing.
Config defines BOOST_NO_IS_ABSTRACT for __SUNPRO_CC < 0x570; I wonder if this needs to be defined for 0x580? Jonathan