
30 Mar
2006
30 Mar
'06
12:22 a.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
"Fernando Cacciola" <fernando_cacciola@hotmail.com> writes:
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
I don't see why Peter is the only one who seems to be responding to the auto_ptr rvalue implicit conversion technique. It just works.
BTW, I forgot to mention that new_ is a great idea! :)
Thanks. The question now is whether this facility should be adopted by the smart pointer library or not, and that's up to Peter. If not, it will need a separate review.
We need documentation and tests as a first step. :-) (Regardless of whether new.hpp ends up in Smart_ptr or Utility.)