23 May
2008
23 May
'08
1:11 a.m.
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Simonson, Lucanus J <lucanus.j.simonson@intel.com> wrote:
I vote we leave the pow template alone, since it isn't broken and doesn't need fixing. (Yes I know my vote doesn't count.)
Runtime-wise, it may be fine, yes. The gain is in going from O(N) template instantiations to O(log N), which helps at compile-time.