7 Jun
2006
7 Jun
'06
11:19 a.m.
Andy Little wrote:
Hi Paul,
"Paul A Bristow" <pbristow@hetp.u-net.com> wrote in message news:E1FneN9-00014T-OY@he303war.uk.vianw.net...
4 It isn't immediately obvious to me how to ensure output in SI 'engineering' multiples, depending on the value. For example, 0.123 m outputs as 1.23 mm, but 1234.5 m outputs as 1.2345 km.
...and this point too: 0.123 m = 123 mm or 1.23 decametres (but not 1.23 mm), so either the above is a bug or incorrectly transcribed. Paul