1 Jul
2005
1 Jul
'05
2:25 a.m.
"Jason Shirk" <jasonsh@microsoft.com> writes:
I fixed this problem after Beta 2. I can't think of a workaround. We are failing type deduction too early during partial ordering when encountering a dependent type.
If you try the June CTP (community technology preview),
Was that sent out, or is it a download? I don't think I have it.
I think you'll see the fix, but if not, rest assured, I verified our most recent internal build compiles this example cleanly
Cool, thanks. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com