Re: [boost] uBLAS results for vc7.1 too good to be true?

Bronek Kozicki writes:

http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/numeric-ubla... (http://tinyurl.com/3vmlv ) Almost all results for vc7.1 are marked "unexpected success".

... and if you follow the cell's link, you'll see the following: Notes This test case used to fail in the reference ("last-known-good") release.

I think this compiler is around for enough long time to mark these results as "just expected" success?

I used to plan to get rid of all "used-to-fail-in-the-LKG-release" dark green cells just before producing the final "release reports", but I'm not so sure now. It may be a good thing if we let users see how much things have improved. -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering