Re: [boost] boost::result_of and C++03

Eric Niebler wrote:

...

Ditto that tr1_function. Am I right?

I don't think you are right, at least not for C++03. There is no decltype, so there can be no inconsistency with it. :-) Do you still think that the tr1_function wrapper I sent around is wrong, and if so, why?

tr1_function seems to require some convertibilty. E.g. result_of<F(int const &)>::type has to be convertible to result_of<F(int)>::type. Regards, -- Shunsuke Sogame