"Daryle Walker" <darylew@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BAY115-DAV9D530B17A66EBC82F5C17BF770@phx.gbl... [...]
template <typename T> class shifted_allocator { public: typedef shifted<T> value_type; typedef shifted_ptr<T> pointer; typedef const shifted_ptr<T> const_pointer; ... };
- value_type: being the real concrete type expected by the smart pointer - pointer: defines the node pointer used internaly by the container [TRUNCATE]
Isn't "const_pointer" supposed to be an analogue of "T const *"? Right now, you have it represent "T * const", which definitely isn't the same thing!
Yes, sorry about that and thanks for the notice. It should be: typedef shifted_ptr<const T> const_pointer; -Phil