26 Dec
2008
26 Dec
'08
11:24 p.m.
Vladimir Batov wrote:
In fact, all that POD/non-POD "fight" seems to be a storm in a cup. The Standard (draft dated 2008-10-04) revised and refined definitions of POD. Now POD is a "trivial class/type" (section 9).
Yes, but as of today I think we still need to consider C++03 our target standard. Nobody even has a C++0x compiler yet. -- David Abrahams Boostpro Computing http://www.boostpro.com