----- Original Message ----- From: "Emil Dotchevski" <emil@revergestudios.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2010 6:16 AM Subject: Re: [boost] Is there any interest in Boost.Conversion? On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:55 PM, vicente.botet <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Emil Dotchevski" <emil@revergestudios.com> What's wrong with
std::vector<A1> va2; std::transform(vb2.begin(),vb2.end(),std::inserter(va2,va2.end()),bind(convert_to<A1>,_1));
_______________________________________________
Nothing. I find the expression longer, useing of iterators, inserters, binds, a place holder .... While the other uses just a function :)
The user can wrap the iterators and inserters in a function, and then it'd be just a function too. That is, if they care; personally I wouldn't bother. _______________________________________________ The idea is to name the function in a uniform way so generic algorithms can use it. Vicente