19 Aug
2009
19 Aug
'09
6:06 p.m.
on 19.08.2009 at 21:20 joel wrote :
set(m)(x, y) = val;//? no?
set is superfluous i think yeah but if we continue in same manner we'll end up with overweghted fat disgusting something
and contrary anyone can define a way (to his taste) to fill an entity using complete but compact public interface (here i mean only members) if a funtion can be implemented as nonmember it must be fewer member functions a class have, more incapsulated the data is -- Pavel