21 Feb
2011
21 Feb
'11
1:40 p.m.
However what you suggest is terribly cryptic.
I beg to differ
It may be seems to be clear but actually is is very wired construction that hard to understand and would likely lead to very bad error messages.
Especially because
rm [ "foo.txt" % "bar.txt" ]
Would not work...
Hmmm, i wonder if turning const char[N] into a custom proto terminal is not enough in fact. just have operator[] waits for a process_expression afterward.