On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 9:19 PM Chuanqi Xu via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Would have been nice if the `export` keyword was accepted and silently ignored when outside of module. Yes, but we have missed the train.
There are more trains. And there's apparently still time for the C++23 train. This is something that would be entirely possible to propose now as an improvement for adoptability of modules. Who wants to write a proposal? Actually, we don't even need a train. Implementations could do that now without any ill effects (and even backported). And use it as implementation experience. What do you think Chuanqi of implementing that in clang? -- -- René Ferdinand Rivera Morell -- Don't Assume Anything -- No Supongas Nada -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net