3 Sep
2010
3 Sep
'10
11:35 p.m.
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:17 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1@gmail.com> wrote:
2. Again, please correct me if I'm wrong about this, but it looks like for "ordinary lambdas" (those that don't need protect), the corresponding bind expressions are always shorter and simpler.
Again, if built on Boost.Phoenix, could it not be just like this as some examples?
using namespace boost::phoenix;
bind(f, _1, 314)(42);
bind(f, bind(g, _2_1), _1_1)(42);
And whatever else...
I'm sorry, but I don't understand how your question relates to the text you quoted. Actually, I can't parse the question either :-) -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com