----Original Message---- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Gennaro Prota Sent: 18 July 2006 12:48 To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] Boost inspection notification (2006-07-16/RC_1_34_0)
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:48:20 +0100, Anthony Williams <anthony_w.geo@yahoo.com> wrote:
The inspection report has duly noted that the current thread library doesn't come under the BSL. This is the main reason for the thread rewrite effort currently underway. How do we mark the existing files, so they won't cause so much noise in the report? Do we just add
// boostinspect::nolicense
to the top of each file?
Yes, with one colon though. It can be anywhere in the file. Since we haven't use that tag yet, we are still in time to change it to something like boostinspect:nobsl or similar, if we prefer, as "nolicense" could be a bit confusing to the casual reader (does it have a license, as stated at the top, or not? :-))
boostinspect:notbooststandardlicense ? -- Martin Bonner Martin.Bonner@Pitechnology.com Pi Technology, Milton Hall, Ely Road, Milton, Cambridge, CB4 6WZ, ENGLAND Tel: +44 (0)1223 203894