Re: [boost] Pimpl library in the file vault

On 10/7/05, Asger Mangaard <tmb@tmbproductions.com> wrote:

What is discussed in exceptional C++ is the use of the pimpl idiom. The library does not implement any of these types, you do. The library just eases the underlying work with memory management, etc.

Ergo I restate my case that this library should NOT be called Pimpl. Maybe PimplHolder or something like that, but calling it Pimpl confuses at least two people :-) -- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com