Re: [boost] [http] Boost.Http review report

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira wrote:

I'm planning to reply once I finish current refactor that you make message model more compatible with Beast one.

Ah, glad to hear you're still in the game! Just a little less than 7 weeks until the Beast formal review period starts, so I'm going through all the old Boost.Http review feedback and try to make everyone happy! If you have questions about recent Beast changes or the message model don't hesitate to open an issue in the GitHub repository, I've also made some changes and I have a little more change planned which will really take care of those folks who want fine grained control over how fields are stored in memory (or if they are stored at all).