On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:32:56 +1100, Matt Hurd <matt.hurd@gmail.com> wrote:
IOn Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:53:03 -0500, Jonathan Brandmeyer
<jbrandmeyer@earthlink.net> wrote:
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 16:06 -0600, Rene Rivera wrote:
True, but it will likely be easier to decide on the substance of the logo without the text. No distractions that way. Not that one should forget totally about the text. But it's much easier to think about what can represent Boost, without the word Boost in it.
So far I see three different concepts for logo:
1) The "<>" brackets.
2) The "++" operator.
3) The rocket.
Perhaps discussing what the logo substance is before getting to deep into the design is best?
I like the concept but not the logo... here is a take on the same concept without the explicit rocket image and an emphasis on the Open Source part of <c++ boOSt>
See, you can just type the logo too :-)
matt. happy user of <c++ boOSt>
Please no. Yuck. -- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com