24 Nov
2009
24 Nov
'09
5:31 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
Christian Schladetsch wrote:
+1 for making it harder to add a new library to boost.
There are already too many libraries.
-1 for making it even harder to add a new library to boost.
Boost and C++ doesn't have anywhere near enough libraries.
-1 too. Other languages are more popular just *because* they have libraries that do everything, we need such things in C++ too, with the speed that C++ provides us. You can never have too many libraries, as long as they are well documented and categorized.