"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto@cs.auc.dk> writes:
"David Abrahams" <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote in message news:ullft2bnb.fsf@boost-consulting.com... | "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto@cs.auc.dk> writes:
| > So my personal feeling is that collection.html is redundant now. | | It's not redundant until you make all the code that relies on it work | with models of the more-general Range.
what code?
For example, the Multi Array library uses the collection concept. In addition to code, you'd need to update the docs.
| Sounds like Collection is a | refinement of Range.
well, I dropped the external/internal concept definitions in the range docs, so currently ranges are defined by free-standing functions and metafunctions and not members.
If you have generalized free-standing functions/metafunctions that work for STL collections, they should work for the Collection concept too. No? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com