2 Feb
2004
2 Feb
'04
1:25 a.m.
"Jeff Garland" <jeff@crystalclearsoftware.com> writes:
[snip]
All this sounds reasonble, but it complicates things alot for both the user and Beman. I'd certainly be ok without these functions for the first release with future addition subject to user need as judged by Beman.
Yes, I certainly think any symbolic link support can be added separately from this path equivalence support. However, I do think the functionality provided by the functions I described is needed. -- Jeremy Maitin-Shepard