Re: [boost] [move][container] Review Request (new versions of Boost.Move and Boost.Container in sandbox and vault)

Ion Gaztañaga wrote:

Gottlob Frege escribió:

...

Any thoughts (from anyone?) on my comments about making flat_map's iterators stable? Then it would be a complete replacement to std::map. Tony

Making flat_xxx a template adaptor (like stack or similar) and using stable_vector as the underlying type would make flat_stable_vector a replacement for std::map.

Best,

Ion

I would prefer it as is, but I haven't had a need for iterator stability. I thought the point of a flat_map/flat_set was to be an as-lightweight-as-possible generic associative container, but still with reasonable (O(log n)) lookup time. Perhaps a policy-based approach is possible, or an entirely separate class, e.g., stable_flat_xxx? - Jeff