
8 Dec
2005
8 Dec
'05
12:45 a.m.
Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
even as is, the counter provides useful information _for library authors_. I used it to determine interest in typeof, which was otherwise undetectable.
Ah, ok. Good point. But for everybody else, the numbers are pretty misleading. I could easily see somebody put off a library because of an uncommonly low download counter. "Well, it couldn't be that interesting or more people would have downloaded it." I'm not sure what we should do. Leave it alone until something better comes along, I suppose. -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com