Re: [boost] [shared_ptr] possible bug in sp_counted_base_cw_ppc.hpp

Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:

I think that the functions

atomic_increment atomic_decrement atomic_conditional_increment

should be marked as inline, as they are defined in a header file. This is causing multiple definition problems, see for instance

http://tinyurl.com/6eub2

Yes, you are right. I'd fix it but I don't know whether "inline" needs to go before or after "asm". ;-) Rene?