On Tuesday 14 November 2006 16:39, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
"Jறஂrgen Hunold" <hunold@ivembh.de> wrote in message news:200611140839.42688.hunold@ivembh.de...
Shall I revert the other changes, too ?
Only those who do nothing make no mistakes ;)
Yes. Thanks for your patience.
Let's see latest regression results.
Okay, a look at http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/te... shows that most test runners have not picked up my changes yes. Which could indicate a problem, too. The only exception is RudbekAssociates-V2, which is down to two regressions. Take a look at http://tinyurl.com/yzdcza http://tinyurl.com/yeyab3 Both can be solved by applying test_tools.diff attached, adding 4 more BOOST_TEST_DECL makros and exporting the missing symbol. Tested on msvc-7.1, this time ;-)) And I would like the last boost_prg_exec_monitor test to link against the static library. Also tested on msvc-7.1. I'll have access to msvc on thursday and friday again. Any comments ? Yours, Jürgen -- * Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! Ingenieurgesellschaft für * voice: ++49 511 262926 57 ! Verkehrs- und Eisenbahnwesen mbH * fax : ++49 511 262926 99 ! Lister Straße 15 * juergen.hunold@ivembh.de ! www.ivembh.de