Re: [boost] [fusion] patch for #5010

On 12/21/2011 01:03 AM, Joel de Guzman wrote:

I was hesitant to have this fix because "nil" is actually part of the API. But, given how pervasive this problem is, it seems the best way to go is to accept the fix and break backward compatibility :( We might have to issue a warning in the docs.

I'll apply the patches (change nil to nil_). Thomas, I'm CC'ing you for the heads up.

You could add a typedef of nil_ to nil if you detect that you're not in Objective-C++ mode (i.e. check for __OBJC__ or similar)