9 Jun
2009
9 Jun
'09
3:48 p.m.
Obviously I will try to adress all concerns raised. Equally obviously, I will be unabled to do so. Both statements do not refute the original proposition, which is that we need a way to sometimes allocate from the stack or from a block of given memory. I think that if we can't have either/both, then there is something wrong with STL. Not that I think that I will win over STL; but wasn't the "point" of allocators such that we could do things like this? I am sure it can be done?? Christian.