Re: [boost] [Boost] [Config] Macros for the absence of a full C++11<memory> implementation

Peter Dimov wrote:

Apart from that, I prepared the patch and submitted a pull request.

We should actually define BOOST_NO_CXX11_STD_ALIGN for Dinkumware version 540. Though it provides std::align in <memory> it is a non-conforming implementation; i.e. it adjusts the pointer correctly but it does not return the correct address. Dinkumware version 610 has it implemented correctly. Glen