On 26/07/2008, Emil Dotchevski <emil@revergestudios.com> wrote:
Actually, I am not sure what's the best category for this library. It's a low level lib, so perhaps it should go under utility, miscellaneous doesn't seem descriptive enough. Any thoughts?
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Daniel James <daniel_james@fmail.co.uk>wrote:
I'm really not sure. Possibly 'Programming Interfaces'? Maybe also 'Concurrent Programming', although that might be stretching it.
2008/7/27 Alp Mestan <alpmestan@gmail.com>:
I think utility would be fine.
But there currently isn't such a category. I'm not against creating one, although it might be a little confusing since there's the utility library.
Concurrent Programming is in my opinion too "restrictive".
It can be in more than one category. Daniel