
16 Dec
2009
16 Dec
'09
10:56 p.m.
Andy Venikov a écrit :
I'm not going to debate whether it's right or wrong, but I'm still curious - why did it have to be a template? When bind() is called it already has all the information about the function's signature
Not in the general case. For function pointers or member function pointers, I suppose it is the case though.