25 Nov
2013
25 Nov
'13
7:18 a.m.
On 25/11/2013 19:23, Quoth Andrey Semashev:
boost::type_info is not a problem by itself, as far as I understood the reviews. The problem was the hack through which it was implemented in the proposed library and the discrepancies with std::type_info. Remove these two issues and boost::type_info becomes a type quite useful for portability.
Yes, that's where I thought consensus was heading.