26 Apr
2006
26 Apr
'06
2:53 p.m.
On 4/26/06, Jose <jmalv04@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/26/06, Paul A Bristow <pbristow@hetp.u-net.com> wrote:
to escape from the async-ness which doesn't seem important in the bigger picture into which this library promises to fit in future?
boost::asio big contribution is in async handling ( networking now and file i/o in the future) so I think is hard to find a better, shorter and more precise name
Why should it be shorter? I think async_io is both better and more precise as it's immediately clear what the a stands for.