gcc 2.95 failures looks like my fault. I added #include <ios>, which is apparently missing. Is there flag that separate standard/classic iostream (If I guess correctly - it shoult be enough) Gennadiy. "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy@meta-comm.com> wrote in message news:m2k6uqyhrm.fsf@meta-comm.com...
A clarification for developers monitoring regression reports: a significant number of Linux regressions showing up in the current reports
(http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/summary.htm l)
is NOT a result of some recent checkin. Most of these failures were there for some time, but weren't highlighted as regressions because the report generation tools didn't have the data for this platform to compare against. This was fixed yesterday.
Similarly, new regressions for "cw-8.3" toolset are only a result of updating the old toolset name ("cwpro83") in the 1.30.2 results.
I hope we can take care of these new issues quickly, although "gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.5.3-linux" in particular doesn't look that good. Is it still a widely-used configuration?
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering